THE AXIS OF ANGER IGNITES/GLOBAL RESISTANCE TO TRUMP GROWING 18/19.01.2026
Including geopolitical issues affecting the balance of power in the ongoing end game war to establish our common future, a closely monitored prison planet or tolerance for diverse modes of governance.
THE SPECIAL MILITARY OPERATION
COALITION OF THE LOSING - INC. USA
RUSSIA & BELARUS/EXPATS IN RUSSIA
NON-ENGLISH NEWS
IS TRUMP TOO STUPID TO BE DEVIOUS? (A.I.Q.)
Is Trump savior of the USA or its destroyer? Has he a marvelous brain & plan others are simply too dense to perceive? Is Trump a “stable genius” or extremely stupid? Is he devious… or simply obvious?
Which description fits Trump best?
A very stable genius.
A malignant narcissist.
Effective and focused.
Not the sharpest tool in the shed.
The best thing since sliced bread.
Dumber than a box of rocks.
A bull in a china shop.
A loose cannon.
Economical with the truth.
An immaculate player of 4D chess.
A devious con-artist.
Or…
“The dumbest goddamn student I ever had.”
Is Trump too stupid to be devious?
Google AI:
In the context of his second term as of January 18, 2026, the debate over whether Donald Trump is “too stupid to be devious” has evolved into a more complex analysis of his unique cognitive and psychological profile. While critics often highlight his lack of traditional intellectual engagement, many analysts argue that this “stupidity” is actually a central component of his strategic deviousness.
The current 2026 perspective on this dynamic includes:
1. The “Genius Conman” vs. Intellectual Deficit
Critics and behavioral analysts frequently distinguish between different types of intelligence when assessing Trump:
Interpersonal Intelligence: Proponents of the “cunning” theory argue that Trump possesses an “uncanny ability” to discover emotional vulnerabilities—fears, anxieties, and desires—to manipulate both individuals and mass crowds. In this view, he is an extraordinarily talented “conman” whose genius lies in political manipulation.
Willful Ignorance: Senior intelligence officials have described a pattern of “willful ignorance” where Trump intentionally ignores expert briefings and nuanced data. Critics argue this is not a lack of ability, but a strategic choice to remain unburdened by facts that might contradict his gut-driven “America First” agenda.
2. “Strategic Deception” as a Policy Tool
By early 2026, several of Trump’s most controversial actions have been labeled as “strategic deception” by major organizations and analysts:
Civil Rights Claims: The NAACP has explicitly accused Trump of being “deceptive” in his claims that civil rights protections constitute “reverse discrimination” against white people. They argue this deception is the point, used to lay the groundwork for rolling back social progress.
Calculated Ambiguity: In his 2026 posture toward Iran, his “dangerous limbo” of threatening action while holding back has been described as “calculated ambiguity” rather than restraint.
Deregulation Deception: Scholars have coined the term “deregulation deception” to describe the administration’s ability to exploit modest regulatory changes for a “symbolic effect,” making it appear as though dramatic change is occurring even when it is not.
3. The “Episodic Man” Theory
Psychologists often describe Trump as an “episodic man”, meaning he lives entirely in the present moment without a consistent internal narrative or long-term plan.
Improvisation as Strategy: This lack of traditional strategic planning can appear “stupid” or chaotic to outsiders, but it serves to make him unpredictable and difficult for institutional “guardrails” to pin down.
Solipsism vs. Narcissism: Some experts argue he is a “solipsist”—someone for whom the only point of reference is himself—making him indifferent to others’ approval and therefore unconcerned with appearing “smart” by traditional standards.
4. Perceived Mental Decline in 2026
A significant counter-narrative in early 2026 is that any previous “deviousness” is being eroded by mental decline:
Cognitive Concerns: Observers have pointed to instances where Trump publicly questioned his own authority to appoint himself chair of the Federal Reserve as evidence of singular stupidity or “clinical dementia”.
Increasing Incoherence: Media and medical professionals have noted that his rhetoric is becoming “less and less coherent” as he approaches his 80th birthday in June 2026, raising questions about whether his current erratic behavior is a strategy or a symptom of decline.
Summary: The consensus in 2026 is that Trump is not too stupid to be devious; rather, his particular form of “stupidity”—characterized by a disregard for facts, impulsive behavior, and a rejection of expertise—is exactly what allows him to be so effectively and unpredictably devious in his use of power.
Is Trump too stupid to be devious?
“I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest”. (Winston Churchill on Russia, 1939)
Paraphrasing Winston Churchill, Trump in place of Russia:
“I cannot forecast to you the action of Trump. Trump is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Trump’s personal interest.”
EUROPE: A MUSEUM MASQUERADING AS AN ECONOMIC UNION? (A.I.Q.)
Europe is fast descending into a sinkhole of despair. It has lost the prestigious place it once had in the hierarchy of nations & is becoming an ever weaker laughing stock, Greenland or no Greenland.
It is often said by certain extremely ignorant elite Americans that Russia is a gas station masquerading as a country. What can we say then about a Europe that is rapidly deindustrializing into becoming a museum piece?
For how long can Europe survive with its sole assets attracting income steadily reducing to museums, architecture and the fine arts?
If Trump succeeds in browbeating and bullying the world (including Denmark re. Greenland) into making America “great again”, and the the rest of the world continues to see economic growth rise year after year… where does that leave deindustrialized Europe and its appendage, so-called Great Britain?
Europe is on a severe downward economic trajectory while Britain is already almost flat-lining. Russia, the nation they call their enemy and which they began the Ukraine debacle to weaken, is going from strength to strength economically. Europe and the UK appear to be, as they say, ‘caught between a rock and a hard place’.
However, due to this ongoing deterioration in both Europe and British industrial outputs there are signs a growing number of the nations involved (with the exclusion of the hardliners) are bowing to the inevitable and are finally beginning to crawl back to Russia looking to reestablish ties.
Perhaps the living standards of the people of Europe can still be saved. It all depends on their will being expressed and paid attention to through the nallot box. (Unfortunately for those who live in not-so-great Britain it appears there are no good political choices left.)
If the situation remains as it is now however then Europe will increasingly become a quaint place to visit for those who wish to examine certain relics of the ancient past.
A museum piece…
How has the social fabric of the EU performed from February 2022 to December 2025?
Since February 2022, the European Union’s social fabric has been under significant strain due to compounding crises, leading to increased financial hardship and a widening gap between rich and poor regions and households. Despite policy efforts to manage the fallout, social cohesion has been tested by economic pressures and internal political divisions.
Key Trends (February 2022 – December 2025)
Cost-of-Living Crisis and Financial Strain: High inflation, driven by soaring energy and food prices after February 2022, disproportionately impacted low- and middle-income households. In 2024, 30% of respondents reported difficulty making ends meet, up from 22% in 2023, while 15% reported arrears on utility bills. This financial distress weakened general public support for government aid to external causes, such as refugees from Ukraine.
Poverty and Social Exclusion: Over one in five people in the EU (around 93.3 million people in 2024) remain at risk of poverty or social exclusion. While the at-risk-of-poverty rate remained relatively stable around 16.2% between 2022 and 2024 due to robust social protection measures and support systems, the most precarious households were hardest hit by the uneven burden of inflation.
How is the German car industry doing currently?
In early 2026, the German car industry is navigating a severe profitability crisis, with major manufacturers reporting their lowest earnings levels since 2009. While some segments show slight sales growth, overall income remains under heavy pressure due to intense competition and shifting global trade policies.
Profit and Revenue Performance
Historic Lows: In late 2025, combined operating profits (EBIT) for Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz plummeted nearly 76% year-over-year to approximately €1.7 billion, the lowest quarterly figure in 16 years.
Revenue Decline: Total industry revenue in 2024 was around €536–542 billion, a decrease from over €564 billion in 2023.
Company-Specific Struggles: Volkswagen Group: Reported a net loss of €3.41 billion in the first nine months of 2025, including a third-quarter loss of over €1 billion.
Mercedes-Benz: Net profit halved to €3.9 billion as revenue fell 8%.
BMW: Net profit slipped 6.8% to €5.7 billion.
Porsche: Experienced a massive 95% plunge in profits during 2025.
Key Drivers of Financial Strain
High Costs: German manufacturers face the world’s highest automotive labor costs, averaging €62 per hour, and industrial energy prices that are three to five times higher than those in the U.S. or China.
Tariff Pressures: Trade tensions are heavily impacting income. For example, U.S. tariffs on German cars—initially 25% in early 2025 before lowering to 15% in August—have significantly cut margins in the industry’s most important export market.
China Competition: German brands are losing market share in China to domestic manufacturers like BYD, whose sales in Europe surged over 248% in 2025, further depressing global income for German firms.
Investment Burdens: Companies are investing heavily—estimated at €320 billion through 2029—in electric vehicles (EVs) and software, which have yet to yield the expected high-margin returns.
2026 Outlook Forecasters remain cautious for the remainder of 2026:
Stagnant Profitability: While sales volume may rise slightly due to new model launches, overall profitability is expected to remain subdued as the sales mix shifts toward lower-margin segments.
Industrial Restructuring: Major players are cutting costs; for instance, supplier Bosch planned roughly 22,000 job cuts for 2025–2026 due to sustained profitability pressures.
What has been the economic and employment effect across Europe of the cessation of supply of Russian oil and gas and the replacement of these by more expensive supplies from the USA?
In January 2026, the transition from Russian energy to alternative supplies, predominantly Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) from the USA, has stabilized Europe’s energy security but at a significant cost to its industrial competitiveness and economic growth.
Economic Effects
Structural Price Disparity: Despite a drop from 2022 peaks, European industrial energy prices remain substantially higher than those in the U.S. and China. In 2024, EU industrial electricity reached €0.199/kWh, compared to €0.075/kWh in the U.S..
Industrial Stagnation: Energy-intensive sectors like chemicals, steel, and wood (which saw a 27% production drop) have been the hardest hit. While recent 2026 forecasts suggest a potential €39 billion saving in energy costs by 2032 as global LNG supply increases, the “competitive gap” with the U.S. remains a major hurdle for recovery.
GDP Impacts: The shift away from Russian energy contributed to a stagnant or slow-growing European economy. Analysts estimate that high energy costs alone have acted as a significant drag, equivalent to roughly 1% of EU GDP.
Sanctions and Phase-out Costs: New EU regulations reached in late 2025 mandate a permanent stop to Russian gas imports, with short-term contracts ending by June 2026 and a full ban by 2027–2028.
Employment Effects
Manufacturing Job Losses: High costs have led to significant industrial restructuring. For example, the German automotive sector, a cornerstone of the European economy, lost approximately 51,500 jobs between 2024 and 2025 due to sustained profitability pressures and high operational costs.
Regional Variance: Central and Eastern European countries (e.g., Czech Republic, Latvia, Hungary) that were historically 100% dependent on Russian gas continue to experience the most acute “economic pain” from decoupling.
Energy Sector Shifts: While traditional manufacturing jobs have declined, there has been a growth in employment within the renewable energy and LNG infrastructure sectors, as Europe rapidly expanded its regasification capacity to handle U.S. imports.
Dependency Shift
US Dominance: By late 2025, the U.S. supplied approximately 45% of the EU’s LNG. While this replaced the dependency on Russia, it has created a new reliance on U.S. trade policy.
Trade Risks: In early 2026, concerns have risen over potential U.S. tariffs (up to 30%) or “unilateral action” from the Trump administration, which could further drive up the cost of these essential energy imports.
Considering the relatively recent change in stance of Slovakia, Hungary, Italy, France and Germany toward Russia in contrast with that of the other EU states how unified is the European Union currently?
In January 2026, the European Union is currently described as a “highly institutionalized battleground”, maintaining a facade of institutional unity while fracturing into distinct sub-coalitions regarding Russia.
The Current Continental Divide
The EU is split into three primary camps with diverging levels of resolve toward Moscow:
The “Peace” Faction (Slovakia & Hungary): These nations actively threaten EU unity by delaying sanctions and questioning military aid. Both governments represent a “small minority” but use veto powers to weaken the bloc’s resolve, leading to threats from Brussels to withdraw their EU funding.
The “Dialogue” Recalibrators (Germany, France, & Italy): In early 2026, leaders from these “Big Three” nations have shifted toward diplomatic re-engagement.
Germany: Chancellor Friedrich Merz recently performed a “full U-turn,” suggesting balance with Russia is possible beyond 2026.
France: President Macron has argued for “properly restarting discussions” with Moscow.
Italy: Prime Minister Meloni has stated “the time has come for Europe to talk to Russia”.
The “Hardliners” (Poland & Baltic States): These states have dramatically increased defense spending—Poland to 4.8% of GDP in 2026—and remain the most vocal opponents of any normalization with Russia.
Key Areas of Friction in 2026
Asset Seizure: The EU has moved forward with freezing Russian assets despite resistance from Hungary, Slovakia, and Italy, who argue such moves have severe economic and legal risks.
Military Aid: While the European Council agreed to a €90 billion loan for Ukraine for 2026–2027, some members dismissed it as a weak compromise because it lacks the resolve to use frozen Russian funds directly for defense.
Shadow Wars: Analysts predict 2026 will be “Europe’s Year of Living Dangerously” as Russia exploits this Western disunity through hybrid attacks on European infrastructure.
Institutional Response
Despite internal paralysis, the EU has successfully renewed core economic sanctions through July 31, 2026. However, the real driver of European rearmament has shifted from the EU as a whole to a “coalition of the willing”—subset of members acting independently of the formal Brussels consensus.
EUROPE: A MUSEUM MASQUERADING AS AN ECONOMIC UNION? (A.I.Q.)
