THE AXIS OF ANGER IGNITES/GLOBAL RESISTANCE TO TRUMP GROWING 28/29.01.2026
Including geopolitical issues affecting the balance of power in the ongoing end game war to establish our common future, a closely monitored prison planet or tolerance for diverse modes of governance.
THE SPECIAL MILITARY OPERATION
RUSSIA’S ALLIES
COALITION OF THE LOSING - INC. USA
RUSSIA & BELARUS/EXPATS IN RUSSIA
NON-ENGLISH NEWS
“WHO SHOULD WE BOMB NEXT LINDSEY?”
As U.S. president there are a great many decisions to be made each day. The most consequential of these concerns when and where to unleash the might of the U.S. military. Today might be that day...
“So many countries... and so little time! So many fighter jets, missiles, warships and soldiers all waiting for me to command them. I feel powerful Lindsey. No one’s going to dare stop me. I have them all running scared. Definitely Iran is next for the chopping black. But then who do we bomb next!? I really want to bomb Cuba, what about you? Good choice? I see you nodding there... Though maybe Venezuela again? Or what about Colombia or Nicaragua. Both fine targets. It’s frustrating, there are so many countries... and so little time!”
“I’ve told you Don, I’ll back you all the way to get the constitution changed so you can run again in 2028. This country needs you. It can’t do without your genius Donnie! We’ll get to every last one of those suckers!”
What has Lindsey Graham said about supporting Donald Trump to run for a third term as president of the USA?
Google AI:
In January 2026, Senator Lindsey Graham continues to be one of the most prominent advocates for Donald Trump seeking a third term in office, a position he has reinforced through several public statements over the past year.
Graham’s Key Statements on a Third Term:
“Trump 2028: I Hope This Never Ends”: Graham’s most frequent refrain regarding a third term was first made during an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News in September 2025. He repeated this sentiment in early 2026, praising Trump’s “decisive leadership” on the world stage and stating he would support a 2028 run despite it being unconstitutional under the 22nd Amendment.
“Democrats’ Worst Nightmare”: Graham initially signaled his support following Trump’s address to Congress in March 2025, posting “Trump 2028!” on social media. While he later claimed to reporters that the post was a “joke,” he has continued to use the phrase in subsequent media appearances and official contexts.
“Ask Me in ‘27”: When pressed by journalists in 2025 on the legal and constitutional barriers to a third term, Graham famously “kicked the can down the road,” telling reporters to “ask me in ‘27”.
Support for Constitutional Workarounds: Graham has expressed openness to legislative efforts that would enable a third term. This includes potential support for a resolution introduced by Representative Andy Ogles (R-TN) to amend the 22nd Amendment to allow for three terms.
Context of the 2028 Musing:
Trump’s Own Rhetoric: Graham’s comments align with Trump’s frequent “teasing” of a third term. In January 2026, Trump prodded House Speaker Mike Johnson during a gathering, asking, “Am I allowed to run again?”.
Transactional Loyalty: Analysts view Graham’s “third term” advocacy as a core part of his strategy to maintain total alignment with the Trump administration as he prepares for his own 2026 Senate re-election bid in South Carolina.
Strategic Distraction: Some observers argue that Graham’s repeated “jokes” about a third term are intended to “troll his critics” and shift the media focus toward hypothetical future runs and away from current controversial policies.
If Lindsey Graham and Donald Trump get their way the world will continue to experience the “genius” of Donald Trump as led by his Neocon nose by his tiny Hitlerite friend. genius attacks, abductions, bombings and missile strikes can be enjoyed by tub-thumping MAGA maniacs until 2032 at least. How many more killings where due process of law and the attendant unpleasant task of finding evidence is dispensed with can they look forward to? Once the precedent of killing people to order was set last year off the coast of Venezuela along with the supply of bombs, missiles and encouragement to the Israelis to conduct a genocide, the sky’s the limit. Who else might Donnie and Lindsey take an active dislike to?
Perhaps, like Obama even be proud of killing Americans overseas by predator drones?
How many Americans active in the Middle East did Barack Obama authorize the killing of through the use of predator drones?
Google AI:
During his presidency, Barack Obama formally acknowledged the killing of four U.S. citizens in drone strikes outside of active war zones in the Middle East and South Asia.
Of these four individuals, only Anwar al-Awlaki was a designated target whom President Obama specifically authorized for “targeted killing”. The other three Americans were reported as unintentional or accidental casualties of separate strikes.
U.S. Citizens Killed by Drone Strikes (Acknowledged by the Obama Administration)
Anwar al-Awlaki (Targeted): A radical Muslim cleric born in New Mexico; killed in Yemen in September 2011.
Samir Khan (Unintentional): An al-Qaeda propagandist from New York; killed in the same September 2011 strike that targeted al-Awlaki in Yemen.
Abdulrahman al-Awlaki (Unintentional): The 16-year-old son of Anwar al-Awlaki; killed in a separate strike in Yemen in October 2011 while searching for his father.
Jude Kenan Mohammad (Unintentional): A former resident of North Carolina; killed in a drone strike in Pakistan.
Additional Context:
Direct Authorization: Under the 2013 Presidential Policy Guidance, the Obama administration required a “near certainty” that no civilians would be killed and that the target presented a “continuing and imminent threat” to Americans.
Controversy: The decision to kill al-Awlaki without a trial drew significant legal and moral criticism, with some organizations labeling it as a potential “extrajudicial execution” of a U.S. citizen.
Other Western Victims: In 2015, Obama also issued a formal apology for a drone strike that accidentally killed two Western hostages—American Warren Weinstein and Italian Giovanni Lo Porto—at an al-Qaeda compound in Pakistan.
And you can be sure ‘Bomber Donald’ is going to get just as good and proud of his extrajudicial killings as Obama was? Hasn’t he already said as much?
What remarks has Donald Trump made about the killing of 126 people in boats off the Venezuelan coast that might give the impression that he is proud of ordering their deaths?
Google AI:
In January 2026, following the military confirmation that 126 people have been killed or are presumed dead in maritime strikes since September 2025, President Trump has made several public remarks that critics describe as “celebratory” and “militaristic”.
Key Remarks and “Militaristic” Rhetoric:
“An Act of Kindness”: In an October 5, 2025, speech to Navy sailors, Trump justified the lethal strikes by claiming that each boat destroyed saves roughly 25,000 American lives. He remarked, “So when you think of it that way, what we’re doing is actually an act of kindness”.
Boasting of “Many” Deaths: Following the January 3, 2026, raid to capture Nicolás Maduro, Trump celebrated the lopsided casualty count. He boasted, “Nobody was killed [on our side], and on the other side, a lot of people were killed,” specifically highlighting that many Cuban personnel were among the dead.
Personal Ownership: Trump has frequently emphasized his direct role in ordering the deaths, stating at a White House event, “I personally signed the order,” and insisting that “narcoterrorists” must be crushed at all costs.
“Amazing Military Feat”: He has described the broader military campaign in Venezuela, which includes the maritime strikes, as an “amazing military feat” and “brilliant”.
Graphic Displays and Warnings:
Social Media “Kill Footage”: Trump has repeatedly posted declassified aerial footage of boat explosions to his Truth Social platform. He accompanied one video showing three deaths with the warning: “BE WARNED – IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!”.
Visual Confirmation Claims: To counter skepticism about the presence of drugs, Trump has claimed to see bags of narcotics in the strike footage, stating, “You see it, the bags of drugs all over the boat... it’s like floating in bags. It’s all over the place”.
Dismissal of Criticism: When confronted with reports that a second strike was ordered to “kill everybody” on a boat—including survivors—the administration dismissed the concerns as “fabricated” and “fake news”.
Geopolitical Context:
International observers, including Colombian President Gustavo Petro, have argued that these remarks are designed to make Trump look like a “militaristic strongman” to his base while “terrorizing the people of the Global South”. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reinforced this tone, declaring that the U.S. military would no longer simply arrest suspects but would “defeat and destroy” them like foreign terrorist organizations.
As for Obama...
What did Barack Obama say once about being good at killing people using predator drones?
Google AI:
In 2013, a controversial quote attributed to Barack Obama surfaced in the book
Double Down: Game Change 2012 by journalists Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. According to the authors, while discussing the U.S. drone program and the targeted killing of militants with senior aides, Obama remarked:
“Turns out I’m really good at killing people. Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.”
Context and Reaction:
Source of the Quote: The authors claim Obama made this comment in private meetings as his administration significantly expanded the use of Predator and Reaper drones for targeted killings in countries like Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia.
Expansion of Drone Warfare: During his two terms, Obama authorized an estimated 542 to 563 drone strikes, a tenfold increase over his predecessor, George W. Bush. These strikes resulted in the deaths of over 3,000 individuals, including hundreds of civilians.
Public Defense vs. Private Remark: Publicly, Obama often spoke about the drone program in measured, legalistic tones, describing it as a “necessary evil” and a “just war” of self-defense. He frequently emphasized that the deaths of civilians “haunt” him and his chain of command.
White House Response: At the time of the book’s release, the White House did not formally confirm or deny the specific quote, though advisers stated the President “hates leaks”.
2026 Perspective: In early 2026, critics of current U.S. maritime and drone strikes continue to reference this quote to highlight what they describe as a “flippant” or “chilling” bipartisan tradition of using extreme military force to maintain American hegemony.
Sitting in the Oval Office after joshing each other over their last round of golf Donnie and Lindsey share a couple of “hard-earned” drinks together. Their minds turn to the future and how they might amuse themselves in the days ahead.
“I’d love to see that there Tehran burn to the ground, wouldn’t you Donnie? Mossad fucked up last week despite the CIA giving them every possible help. Now it’s up to us.”
“I guess so Lindy. When I do a job I do it right. No one bombs better than I do. We have the most beautiful bombs on the planet!”
“You are so right. Those are genius bombs Don, and you are the stable genius that knows just when to unleash those babies!”
“Beautiful, isn’t it? My beautiful babies. This is going to be another gorgeous show! I can hardly wait!
But Lindy, hang on, you havn’t told me yet, after we do Iran... who do we bomb next?”
“WHO SHOULD WE BOMB NEXT LINDSEY?”
