THE AXIS OF ANGER IGNITES/GLOBAL RESISTANCE TO TRUMP GROWING 05/06.02.2026
Including geopolitical issues affecting the balance of power in the ongoing end game war to establish our common future, a closely monitored prison planet or tolerance for diverse modes of governance.
THE SPECIAL MILITARY OPERATION
RUSSIA’S ALLIES
COALITION OF THE LOSING - INC. USA
RUSSIA & BELARUS/EXPATS IN RUSSIA
NON-ENGLISH NEWS
TRUMP: THE MEDIOCRE “MEDIATOR”
A mediator is a NEUTRAL third party who facilitates communication between disputing sides to help them reach a voluntary, mutually “win-win” agreement. Can Trump be said to be neutral?
It has been admitted by no less a person than U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio that the war in Ukraine is in fact a war by the USA against Russia using Ukraine as its proxy.
Rubio’s exact words:
“Frankly, it’s a proxy war between nuclear powers: the United States, helping Ukraine, and Russia.”
In spite of the above, Donald Trump has decided he can be a mediator in the conflict.
How many times in the past has an active combatant in a war has assigned themselves as a neutral mediator supposedly seeking an end to it? The answer is of course zero. It is, on its face, a ludicrous concept. Especially so in this case as the USA has been the predominant supplier of weaponry, funding and intelligence to successive Ukrainian regimes since the beginning of the conflict.
Who, between 2014 and the end of 2026 has supplied the Ukrainian regime and military with the majority of its intelligence regarding Russian positions, assets and other information allowing better targeting of Russian forces and assets by the Ukrainian military and intelligence services?
Google AI:
From 2014 through late 2024, the United States was the dominant provider of intelligence to Ukraine, establishing a “secret intelligence partnership” that became the backbone of Ukrainian military operations.
Despite Donald Trump stating he would end the war in Ukraine within the first 24 hours of assuming his second presidency the war continues. Could it be perhaps that funding, arming and providing intelligence to the Ukrainian regime has continued from his first day to this? What kind of a mediator supplies one side in a war he is supposedly trying to end?
It would have made sense for Donald Trump to claim to be an honest broker in this conflict if he had withdrawn from his role as supporter of one side when he became president. But he did not. He continued to authorize that support and continues to do so, albeit there are reports that from January 15th the nation of France has taken over two-thirds of the intelligence support of the regime in Ukraine with the USA presumably continuing to supply the remaining one third.
Google AI:
Between 2014 and 2024 the CIA supported the construction of a network of 12 secret spy bases along the Russian border, which were used to track Russian troop movements, missile attacks, and maintain spy networks.
By the early stages of the invasion in 2022, U.S. and Ukrainian officers were working side-by-side in mission command centers, where American intelligence guided big-picture battle strategy and provided precise targeting information directly to soldiers in the field.
European intelligence officials noted that by 2022-2023, U.S. intelligence had become so enmeshed in Ukrainian operations that they were effectively “part of the kill chain”. U.S. intel was considered essential for the functioning of American-made weapon systems, such as HIMARS.
How easy do you think the Russians find it to trust one of the active agents of their enemy in their negotiating with USA? Imagine you, as a representative of Russia being given assurances that he or she is a neutral party to what is going on? A neutral party whose president continues to authorize assistance to the Ukrainians that results in hundred, perhaps thousands of dead Russians. How far would your trust extend to such people?
Trump’s sometimes talks as if his hands are clean on the subject of Russians killed by the direct result of the USA being an active partner of the Ukrainian regime and its military. As with so many other issues Trump is lying through his teeth.
Barack Obama refused to supply offensive weaponry to the Ukrainian military. When did this policy change?
The policy shifted definitively in December 2017 under the Donald Trump administration.
While Barack Obama limited aid to “non-lethal” equipment (such as radars, night-vision goggles, and Humvees) to avoid escalating tensions with Moscow, his successor reversed this stance:
The Decision (Dec 2017): The Trump administration approved the first sale of lethal defensive weapons to Ukraine, most notably the Javelin anti-tank missile systems.
The Rationale: Proponents argued that “defensive” lethal weapons would raise the cost of Russian aggression, while critics at the time—and later Trump himself—noted the move “said the quiet part out loud” by moving from symbolic support to active military backing.
The Delivery (April 2018): The first shipment of Javelins arrived in Ukraine, marking a fundamental change in the U.S.-Ukraine security relationship.
If Donald Trump had truly wished to end the Ukraine war through his mediating a peace deal between the Russian leadership and the Ukrainian regime he would have suspended his country’s direct involvement in the war. That he did not do this and that his previous actions in giving the green light to deliver of lethal weaponry to the Ukrainian military with which to kill Russians when the previous president would not, marks him as totally unsuited to perform this function.
Donald Trump was capable on January 20th 2025 of ending this war, at least within weeks, by calling a halt to all provision of weaponry, funding, and most important of all, intelligence to the Ukrainian leadership in Kiev. That he did not do so makes him just about the worst mediator anyone could have chosen for that vitally important role.
TRUMP: THE MEDIOCRE “MEDIATOR”
GEORGE ORWELL: THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LIES
The establishment running all aspects of life in the western world has created a miasma of respectability around itself. That carefully constructed facade is now in danger of completely dissolving.
George Orwell would find plenty that is familiar to him in respect of the Epstein affair within today’s elite scene in the West.
Orwell, in 1984: “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.”
Google AI:
The relationship between George Orwell’s fictional world and the response to the Epstein crisis is often framed through the lens of authoritarian control, truth manipulation, and elite impunity.
Currently the elite establishment of the entire West wants you to believe that an obvious Israeli intelligence operation is the work of the Russians.
WAR IS PEACE - FREEDOM IS SLAVERY - IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
ISRAEL IS RUSSIA!
Western establishment elites, having succeeded in shutting Epstein up but failing in their efforts to hide incriminating evidence against them in the Epstein files, are now busy trying to divert public attention away from themselves toward Russia.
The dedication with which western elites will seek to protect the mass-murdering Israeli elite appears to have no upper limit. The genocidal elite of Israel are provided not only with complete immunity, no matter the extent of their crimes against humanity, they also have in addition, the West’s fulsome support. Any fact or observation contradicting the narratives issued by the western establishment will be attacked and every attempt will be made to discredit the source and consign those facts or observations to a ‘memory hole’.
Google AI:
The ongoing furor over the Epstein files is often compared to the Orwellian “memory hole,” where inconvenient facts are vanished to protect those in power. This fuels a perception that an “autocratic class” determines what information remains in the public record.
The coordinated attempt to divert public opinion away from Israel toward Russia is being promulgated with 100% complicity by western news media.
Google AI:
The use of legal euphemisms to “paper over ugly realities” in high-profile scandals mirrors Orwell’s Newspeak, where language is restricted to prevent people from even being able to conceptualize certain crimes or injustices.
Western establishment figures have another, equal concern to that of protecting Israel from western populations realizing it is they, not the Russians who have been grossly interfering in their democracies. That is their concern to protect themselves through protecting their carefully manipulated reputations. The Epstein files have opened up their entire world to view and the deep levels of degradation and criminality that exists there. The fear of their exposure as degenerates equals their fear that their secrets in the Epstein files will damage Israeli influence. This could bring about the complete disposal of the entire sleaze-ridden establishment now running the West. Its desperate and patently obvious lies in trying to link the Israeli Epstein operation to Russia could not show this more clearly. They are in panic mode and blatant lies or about all such people at risk of being utterly exposed for what they are, have left.
Google AI:
Establishment Impunity: Orwell’s work often skewered the “rich swine” and establishment corruption. The Epstein case is seen by many as a real-world manifestation of an oligarchy that operates by a different set of rules, beyond the reach of standard justice.
GEORGE ORWELL: THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LIES
