WILL WORLD WAR III BE WORTH IT?

The western elites are determined to dominate our world so that they can bring it western liberal values which include two principal items that they say only they have and can provide: ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’.

To achieve this domination is clearly their goal. It has been stated in diverse ways over the years and there can be no serious doubt about this.

But what are they willing to countenance in the way of human misery, death, destruction and long-term chaos on the way to achieving them?

It appears they are willing to see a great deal of the above as they are showing no sign of settling for any compromise position.

The war mode western elites have now fully settled into shows clearly that no diplomacy will be allowed to create any degree of tolerance for individuals or systems they are sworn to eliminate for the sake of the goals named above.

Their agenda for the future really is all or nothing. I would dare anyone to show me a single circumstance that indicates otherwise.

If China was not as strong as she is and if the leadership of Russia was not as determined to be as independent as it is and if 9/11 had not happened I suspect we would not be in the position we are.

Not yet anyway.

These three circumstances have instilled a dramatic sense of urgency into the plan that without doubt preceded each one of them.

The elites of the USA have believed themselves the ultimate inheritors of the world for much longer than the events of 9/11 2001. The document beloved by what used to be called the neoconservatives, 'The New American Century’ prophesied this as an almost inevitable occurrence. The Soviet Union along with the Warsaw Pact had completely fallen apart and appeared to be destined for abject penury, a very welcome weakness where no stable or strong government would ever be seen again and where vastly rich oligarchs and mafia bosses held most power in a neverending war between rival factions.

As discussed in ‘The New American Century’, a Pearl harbor event was needed to spur the USA on to its final rightful place in the world as its overseer, guardian and top cop. I am not one that considers 9/11 as an inside job but in any event it served as the cathartic event that the neocons sought.

But then China began her exponential rise. And Putin made his Munich speech of 2007.

The barriers to the goal of global U.S. oversight and control seemed to rise out of nowhere to stymie the newly boosted neocon plans. China and Russia were now becoming stronger, China incredibly so, and Russia steadily so.

This was not how it was supposed to be.

Then began the regime change wars... which China and Russia refused to support of course.

These were a disaster for the U.S. and its allies... or so they seemed.

But if all you need is to terminally weaken your enemies it isn’t absolutely required that you take them over completely. Besides, it was Russia and China that were the major targets, these were simply quite useful steps along the way. Not only in geopolitical terms of course, but in economical terms also.

Devastating the low-hanging fruit of economies along the way to the main targets, especially when they were usually allies of the major targets was considered an optimum direction of travel.

Then Covid hit the West. And while China effectively beat it the West did not.

For this reason the ‘Ice Cold War’ ratcheted up a few notches, the timeline to destroying Russia and China by any means necessary foreshortened. (I call it the ‘Ice Cold War’ by the way to differentiate it from the ‘Cold War’ where there was at least some true diplomacy and dialogue. During the ‘Ice Cold War’ there will only be a pretense of either and in reality only U.S. DEMANDS.)

The juggernaut is set on a single course, total victory over all those individuals and nations presenting a barrier to total U.S. security in perpetuity and thus its supreme dominance and global overview providing overriding manipulative control.

And the damage along the way? Factored in. It can be as high as may be but it will never be seen as too high. Why is that? Because the goal of total U.S. security in perpetuity will always be set higher.

This is why western elites consider that World War Three, which has been running since at least 9/11, is indisputably “worth it”.